Mediación de la diplomacia pública
Los videojuegos como espacio virtual para la resolución de conflictos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29105/gmjmx18.35-7Palabras clave:
videojuegos, juegos serios, diplomacia pública, poder suave, contacto imaginadoResumen
En la última década, los videojuegos como campo de estudio han ganado mayor relevancia, resultando en el reconocimiento de otros campos de estudio que los incluyen como extensión de su propia investigación, sumando nuevos retos y oportunidades a la forma en que se entienden esos campos. Si bien ha habido un aumento en la producción y estudio de videojuegos en disciplinas de estudios internacionales, como el desarrollo internacional y la salud global, se han realizado pocas investigaciones sobre sus posibilidades como herramientas de diplomacia pública. Empleando métodos cualitativos, este análisis teórico explora el uso de los videojuegos para la resolución de conflictos como parte de una estrategia de diplomacia pública. A partir de la teoría de contacto intergrupal imaginado se argumenta que los videojuegos fungen como catalizadores para la creación de un tercer espacio virtual en el que relaciones intergrupales pueden fomentar la disminución de prejuicios negativos y el incremento de empatía, elementos necesarios para programas de diplomacia pública.
Descargas
Métricas
Citas
Adachi, P. J. C., Hodson, G., & Hoffarth, M. R. (2015). Video game play and intergroup relations: Real world implications for prejudice and discrimination. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 25, 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.09.008
Adachi, P. J. C., Hodson, G., Willoughby, T., & Zanette, S. (2015). Brothers and sisters in arms: Intergroup cooperation in a violent shooter game can reduce intergroup bias. Psychology of Violence, 5(4), 455–462. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037407
Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Amichai-Hamburger, Y., Hasler, B. S., & Shani-Sherman, T. (2015). Structured and unstructured intergroup contact in the digital age. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 515–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.022
Amichai-Hamburger, Y., & Hayat, Z. (2013). Internet and personality. In Y. Amichai-Hamburger (Ed.), The social net: Understanding our online behavior (2nd ed., pp. 1–28). Oxford Scholarship Online.
Bagci, S. C., Piyale, Z. E., Bircek, N. I., & Ebcim, E. (2018). Think beyond contact: Reformulating imagined intergroup contact theory by adding friendship potential. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21(7),
–1052. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217690237
Bajaj, M., & Hantzopoulos, M. (2016). Peace education: International perspectives. Bloomsbury Academic.
Belman, J., & Flanagan, M. (2010). Designing games to foster empathy. International Journal of Cognitive Technology, 15(1), 5–15.
Bermeo, M. J. (2016). Teaching for peace in settings affected by urban violence: Reflections from Guayaquil, Ecuador. In M. Bajaj & M. Hantzopoulos (Eds.), Peace education: International perspectives (pp. 157– 173). Bloomsbury Academic.
Bretag, T. (2006). Developing “third space” interculturality using computer-mediated communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(4), 981–1011. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083- 6101.2006.00304.x
Burak, A., & Parker, L. (2017). Power play: How video games can save the world. St. Martin’s Press.
Byrd, C. (2014, December 29). In “Never Alone” Native Alaskans explore the future of oral tradition. The Washington Post. https://wapo.st/3p1IMDZ
Causado Escobar, R. E., & Pacheco Bohórquez, M. L. (2018). El aprendizaje basado en videojuegos y la gamificación como estrategias para construir y vivir la convivencia escolar. Revista Cedotic, 3(1), 59–80. https://bit.ly/3cQZjF0
Chaudhary, L., Rubin, J., Iyer, S., & Shrivastava, A. (2020). Culture and colonial legacy: Evidence from public goods games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 173, 107–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2020.03.005
Cheong, Y.-G., Khaled, R., Grappiolo, C., Campos, J., Martinho, C., Ingram, G., Paiva, A., & Yannakakis, G. (2011, June 29). [Presentation] A computational approach towards conflict resolution for serious games. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Foundations of Digital Games, ordeaux, France, 15– 22.
Cowan, G., & Arsenault, A. (2008). Moving from monologue to dialogue to collaboration: The three layers of public diplomacy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 10–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311863
Crisp, R. J., & Turner, R. N. (2009). Can imagined interactions produce positive perceptions?: Reducing prejudice through simulated social contact. American Psychologist, 64(4), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014718
Cuhadar, E., & Kampf, R. (2014). Learning about conflict and negotiations through computer simulations: The case of PeaceMaker. International Studies Perspectives, 15(4), 509–524. https://doi.org/10.1111/insp.12076
Darnton, C. (2020). Public diplomacy and international conflict resolution: A cautionary case from Cold War South America. Foreign Policy Analysis, 16, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/fpa/orz003
Darvasi, P. (2016). Empathy, perspective, and complicity: How digital games can support peace education and conflict resolution. In M. Faetanini & R. Tankha (Eds.), Social inclusion of internal migrants in India: Internal migration in India initiative. United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization.
Döveling, K., Harju, A. A., & Sommer, D. (2018). From mediatized emotion to digital affect cultures: New technologies and global flows of emotion. Social Media + Society, 4(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117743141
Entman, R. M. (2008). Theorizing mediated public diplomacy: The U.S. case. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 13(2), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161208314657
Fatić, A., Korać, S., & Bulatović, A. (2011). Empathy in diplomacy. The Review of International Affairs, 53(1142), 5–13.
Fernández-Vara, C. (2019). Introduction to game analysis (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Ferreira, P. C., Veiga Simão, A. M., Paiva, A., Martinho, C., Prada, R., Ferreira, A., & Santos, F. (2021). Exploring empathy in cyberbullying with serious games. Computers & Education, 166, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104155
Games For Change. (n.d.) Game Exchange. https://bit.ly/3D5705r
Gamesutra. (2021, April 7). Games for Change Receives Stevens Initiative Funding for Program to Virtually Connect Young People Around the World. https://bit.ly/3HXQwQe
García Martínez, A. (2019). Persuasive qualities of games as an artistic medium with a social function. The International Visual Culture Review, 1, 23–31. https://doi.org/10.37467/gka-visualrev.v1.1775
Hasler, B. S., Hirschberger, G., Shani-Sherman, T., & Friedman, D. A. (2014). Virtual peacemakers: Mimicry increases empathy in simulated contact with virtual outgroup members. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17(12), 766–771. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2014.0213
Kneer, J., & Jacobs, R. S. (2018). Grow up, level up, and game on; Evolving games research. Media and Communication, 6(2), 56–59. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i2.1566
Leonard, M. (2002). Diplomacy by other means. Foreign Policy, 132, 48–56. https://doi.org/10.2307/3183455 Malhotra, D., & Liyanage, S. (2005). Long-term effects of peace workshops in protracted conflicts. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49(6), 908–924. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002705281153
Marsh, T. (2011). Serious games continuum: Between games for purpose and experiential environments for purpose. Entertainment Computing, 2(2), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2010.12.004
McClory, J. (2021). Socially distanced diplomacy: The future of soft power and public diplomacy in a fragile world (p. 56). Sanctuary Counsel & USC Center on Public Diplomacy.
McDowell, A. (2019). Storytelling shapes the future. Journal of Futures Studies, 23(3), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.6531/JFS.201903_23(3).0009
Nye, J. S., Jr. (2019). Soft power and public diplomacy revisited. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 14(1–2), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-14101013
Owles, E. (2012, November 15). USAID and Games for Change release Half the Sky mobile games. Games For Change. https://bit.ly/3HwoBA7
Peckham, M. (2014, November 21). Never Alone is a harrowing journey into the folklore of Alaska Natives. WIRED. https://bit.ly/3xmiBvD
Pellicone, A., & Ahn, J. (2018). Building worlds: A connective ethnography of play in Minecraft. Games and Culture, 13(5), 440–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412015622345
Ritterfeld, U., Cody, M. J., & Vorderer, P. (2009). Introduction. In U. Ritterfeld, M. J. Cody, & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Serious Games: Mechanisms and Effects (pp. 3–9). Routledge.
Saleme, P., Dietrich, T., Pang, B., & Parkinson, J. (2021). Design of a digital game intervention to promote socio- emotional skills and prosocial behavior in children. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 5(58), 1– 19. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mti5100058
Sanford, K., Starr, L. J., Merkel, L., & Bonsor Kurki, S. (2015). Serious games: Video games for good? E-Learning and Digital Media, 12(1), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753014558380
Schrier, K. (2017). Designing games for moral learning and knowledge building. Games and Culture, 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412017711514
Seo, H., & Thorson, S. (2016). Empathy in public diplomacy: Strategic academic engagement with North Korea. In J. Pamment (Ed.), Intersections between public diplomacy & international development: Case studies in converging fields (pp. 19–34). Figueroa Press.
Shakeri, M. (2021). Conviction or evocation: On the limits and potentials of the contemporary concept of values of games. International Journal of Persian Literature, 6, 54–74. https://doi.org/10.5325/intejperslite.6.0054
Shliakhovchuk, E. (2018, November 12). Using video games in intercultural, diversity and inclusive education [Presentation]. 11th Annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation, Sevilla, Spain. https://doi.org/10.4995/ia.2014.3293
Smith, N. (2021, April 7). U.S. State Department announces new video game diplomacy program. Washington Post. https://wapo.st/3CTZn1w
The Center for Citizen Diplomacy. (n.d.). Understanding Citizen Diplomacy. https://bit.ly/3oVc8DY
Vezzali, L., Capozza, D., Di Bernardo, G. A., Falvo, R., Stathi, S., & Hodson, G. (2021). Strategies for the promotion of humanity attribution to outgroups. European Review of Social Psychology, 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2021.1963156
West, K., Hotchin, V., & Wood, C. (2017). Imagined contact can be more effective for participants with stronger initial prejudices. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 47(5), 282–292. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12437
USC Center on Public Diplomacy. (n.d.a). What is PD? https://bit.ly/32AyRxF
USC Center on Public Diplomacy. (n.d.b) Public diplomacy and virtual worlds. https://bit.ly/3p0LPfD
Zaharna, R. S. (2019). Culture, Cultural Diversity and Humanity-centred Diplomacies. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 14(1–2), 117–133. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-14101018
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
GMJ México, publicación semestral, editada por el Departamento de Psicología y Comunicación de Texas A&M International University, Laredo, Texas, Estados Unidos; y la Facultad de Ciencias de la Comunicación de la Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, México. Editores responsables: Dr. José Carlos Lozano y Dr. Francisco Javier Martínez Garza. Datos de contactos: jose.lozano@tamiu.edu, tel. (956) 326-3117 y francisco.martinezgz@uanl.edu.mx, teléfono (81) 83294000, Ext. 7710 y 7711. Reserva de derechos al uso exclusivo número 04 – 2017- 080814012900- 203, expedido por la Dirección de Reservas de Derechos del Instituto Nacional del Derecho de Autor. ISSN: 2007-2031. El editor no necesariamente comparte el contenido de los artículos, ya que son responsabilidad exclusiva de los autores. Se prohíbe la reproducción total o parcial del contenido, ilustraciones y textos publicados en este número sin la previa autorización que por escrito emita el editor.
