Limits and stereotypes of Mexican culture towards women in positions of power
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29105/gmjmx23.45-564Keywords:
female leadership, stereotypes, perceptions, ideology, LAPOPAbstract
The federal executive power in Mexico has historically been led by men. The nomination of women for these positions represents a paradigm shift with international implications. It is uncommon for two women to compete for a country's presidency with significant chances of winning. The political culture of Mexicans, as well as that of most of the world, has traditionally assumed and normalized male leadership. This study aims to analyze the predispositions of Mexican citizens—both men and women—toward female leadership, considering gender, ideological orientations, and whether they belong to rural or urban areas. The analysis is based on data from the latest wave of The AmericasBarometer, Latin American Public Opinion Project (2023), Mexico section, to examine the attitudes and judgments that citizens express regarding the suitability of women in positions of power. The results indicate that positive perceptions of female leadership are influenced by ideology, with higher acceptance among left-leaning sectors, while traditional gender roles continue to limit women's access to power.
Downloads
References
Barnes, T. D., & Beaulieu, E. (2019). Women politicians, institutions, and perceptions of corruption. Comparative Political Studies, 52(1), 134–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018774355 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018774355
Buvinić, M., & Roza, V. (2004). Women, Politics, and Democratic Prospects in Latin America. Inter-American Development Bank. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18235/0008900
Chen, Y. C., Fan, E., Ho, Y. H., Lee, M. Y. H., & Liu, J. T. (2025). The impact of female political leadership on gender attitudes: Evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Development Economics, 166, 103451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2025.103451 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2025.103451
Chueri, J., & Damerow, A. (2022). Closing the gap: How descriptive and substantive representation affect women’s vote for populist radical right parties. West European Politics, 46(5), 928–946. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2022.2113219 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2022.2113219
D’Adamo, O., García-Beaudoux, V., Ferrari, G., & Slavinsky, G. (2008). Female candidates: Public perception of female leadership. International Journal of Social Psychology, 23(1), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1174/021347408783399534 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1174/021347408783399534
Devroe, R., & Wauters, B. (2018). Political Gender Stereotypes in a List-PR System with a High Share of Women MPs: Competent Men versus Leftist Women?. Political Research Quarterly, 71(4), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912918761009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912918761009
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573
Fernández, A. (2006). Mujeres y política en América Latina: Dificultades y aceptación social. Argumentos, 19(51), 117–143.
Freidenberg, F., & Lajas García, S. (2015). De la cuota a la paridad: Las reformas para mejorar la representación política de las mujeres en América Latina (Documento de Trabajo n.º 11). Observatorio de Reformas Políticas en América Latina; OEA.García Méndez, E. (2019). Representación política de las mujeres en los Congresos subnacionales en México. Un modelo de evaluación. Estudios Políticos, (46), 73–98.
Georgakakis, D., & Bordier, S. (2025). Women’s leadership in the EU institutions: Between symbolic presence and substantive influence. European Political Science Review, 17(1), 23–47. https://hal.science/hal-05438708v1
Gilas, K., & Cruz, L. M. (2022). Ciencia política en perspectiva de género. UNAM.
González Victoria, R. M. (2018). Emociones, narrativas y prejuicios sexistas. “Las juanitas”, un caso de violencia política de género contra mujeres. Edähi Boletín Científico de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades del ICSHu, 7(13), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.29057/icshu.v7i13.3489 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29057/icshu.v7i13.3489
Gorman, E. H., & Kmec, J. A. (2007). We (have to) try harder: Gender and required work effort in Britain and the United States. Gender & Society, 21(6), 828–856. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243207309900 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243207309900
Gothreau, C., & Laustsen, L. (2025). Shifting stereotypes about men and women candidates: Experimental evidence from three countries. Political Psychology, 46(2), 215–233. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X25000042 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X25000042
Hernández-Gutiérrez, J. C., Cárdenas-Arguedas, S., & Cortés-Hernández, A. K. (2023). ¿De la representación descriptiva a la sustantiva? Mujeres y política en América Latina. Universitas-XXI, Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanas, (39), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.17163/uni.n39.2023.02 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17163/uni.n39.2023.02
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI). (2017). Encuesta Nacional sobre Discriminación (ENADIS) 2017: Principales resultados. https://www.inegi.org.mx/programas/enadis/2017/
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI). (2022). Encuesta Nacional sobre Discriminación (ENADIS) 2022: Principales resultados. https://www.inegi.org.mx/programas/enadis/2022/
Johns, R., & Shephard, M. (2006). Gender, candidate image and electoral preference. British Politics, 9(3), 434–460. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856x.2006.00263.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856x.2006.00263.x
Matland, R. E., & Tezcür, G. M. (2011). Women as candidates: An experimental study in Turkey. Politics & Gender, 7(3), 365–390. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X11000262 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X11000262
Kantorowicz Reznichenko, E., Dąbrowska, J., & Kantorowicz, J. (2025). A feminine or masculine crisis? Voter evaluations of gendered leadership during COVID-19. European Journal of Political Research, 64(1), 88–109. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X24000369 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X24000369
Kittilson, M. C. (2010). Women, parties and platforms in post-industrial democracies. Party Politics, 17(1), 66-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068809361012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068809361012
Kweon, Y. (2024). We see symbols but not saviors: Women’s representation and the political attitudes of working class women. Political Psychology, 45(2), 673–691. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12953 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12953
Latin American Public Opinion Proyect (2023). AmericasBarometer 2023 Year Merge Dataset (Version 1.0) [Data set]. Center for Global Democracy, Vanderbilt University. https://www.vanderbilt.edu/lapop/
Liu, S.-J. S., & Banaszak, L. A. (2017). Do government positions held by women matter? A cross-national examination of female ministers’ impacts on women’s political participation. Politics & Gender, 13(1), 132–162. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X16000490 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X16000490
March, J., & Olsen, J. (1997). El redescubrimiento de las instituciones. La base organizativa de la política. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Matland, R. E. (1994). Putting Scandinavian equality to the test: An experimental evaluation of gender stereotyping of political candidates in a sample of Norwegian voters. British Journal of Political Science, 24(2), 273–292. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400009819 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400009819
Purcell, N. L., & Nagao, H. (2024). Women in leadership in the party: Women’s representation in intra party leadership and party positions on gender equality in employment. Party Politics, 30(6), 1100–1111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688231196424
Reskin, B. F. (2003). Including mechanisms in our models of ascriptive inequality: 2002 Presidential Address. American Sociological Review, 68(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088900 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3088900
Ribeiro Ferreira, M. (2004). Relaciones de género: Equilibrio entre las responsabilidades familiares y profesionales. Papeles de Población, 10(39), 219–237. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1405-74252004000100009&lng=es&tlng=es
Torres Oyanedel, R., & Suárez-Cao, J. (2023). La subrepresentación de alcaldesas en Chile: Limitaciones y desafíos de la representación política de las mujeres. Elecciones, 22(26), 205–228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53557/Elecciones.2023.v22n26.06
Verge, T. (2006). De la cuota a la democracia paritaria: Estrategias partidistas y representación política de las mujeres en España. Política, 46, 107–139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5354/0716-1077.2006.17264
Woo, B.-D., Kim, M., & Osborn, T. (2025). Gendered punishment? How the corruption of female politicians affects public opinion of female political leadership. International Political Science Review, 47(1), 59-74. https://doi.org/10.1177/01925121241302776 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01925121241302776
Wolton, D. (2007). Pensar la comunicación: Puntos de vista para políticos y periodistas. Prometeo.
Zaller, J. R. (1992). The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511818691
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Global Media Journal México
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Global Media Journal México, publicación semestral, editada por el Departamento de Psicología y Comunicación de Texas A&M International University, Laredo, Texas, Estados Unidos; y la Facultad de Ciencias de la Comunicación de la Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, México. Editores responsables: Dr. José Carlos Lozano y Dr. Francisco Javier Martínez Garza. Datos de contactos: jose.lozano@tamiu.edu, tel. (956) 326-3117 y francisco.martinezgz@uanl.edu.mx, teléfono (81) 83294000, Ext. 7710 y 7711. Reserva de derechos al uso exclusivo número 04 – 2017- 080814012900- 203, expedido por la Dirección de Reservas de Derechos del Instituto Nacional del Derecho de Autor. ISSN: 2007-2031. El editor no necesariamente comparte el contenido de los artículos, ya que son responsabilidad exclusiva de los autores. Se prohíbe la reproducción total o parcial del contenido, ilustraciones y textos publicados en este número sin la previa autorización que por escrito emita el editor.
